https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412447
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Haumann <dhaum...@kde.org> --- I think Christoph's point is exactly about NOT allowing these 0.1 increments. Say we optimize it in such a way that we have the 2^-n steps (e.g. 0.125, or 0.25), then these values at least can be represented as floating point value. Adding an advanced mode that again lets the user to break things is not a good idea, is it? So +1 for the 0.25 steps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
