https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407913
Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |n...@kde.org
--- Comment #1 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> ---
The request in this bug would be a huge regression to my workflow. Needing to
explicitly validate the autocompleted result would make using KRunner slower
and require more brainpower. To me one of the biggest advantages is how you can
use it practically at the speed of thought.
I think one of the real bugs here is that "2+2" didn't give you the calculator
as the top entry.
> (And by the way, the result of the computation takes a
> considerable time to show up the first time, but this is probably another
> bug).
Yep, it's Bug 406384, which has an easy workaround (see bug report for more
details).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
