https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406889
--- Comment #6 from Martin Tlustos <martin.tlus...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to IWBR from comment #4) > Ok, but in order to do so Digikam would still need to identify the rest of > the faces, and purposely ignore them, since it can't know if a person isn't > someone in particular until he/she has been identified. > > So what you propose is an option to hide or ignore all faces except those > that match some specific persons, right? > > In that case, it would be a step-up from what is proposed in bug #392023, in > which you could manually ignore selected faces. But in this case, > automatically if they don't meet certain criteria. You would need to specify > beforehand which people are in the white-list I guess. And automatically > move all non-matching people from the "Unknown" category to the "ignored". > > Although, depending on how good the algorithm is, it can lead to true > matches being ignored. Yes, there is a risk of true faces being ignored. But you need to weigh it against the other side - having thousands of unwanted faces you have to deal with. I don't really know what the best solution would be, I'll leave that up to you (of course... ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
