https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404275
--- Comment #12 from Wolfgang Bauer <wba...@tmo.at> --- (In reply to geofflove77 from comment #0) > Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f53b980c000 (LWP 21635)): > [KCrash Handler] > #6 std::__atomic_base<int>::load (__m=std::memory_order_relaxed, this=0x51) > at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/atomic_base.h:390 > #7 QAtomicOps<int>::load<int> (_q_value=...) at > ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qatomic_cxx11.h:227 > #8 QBasicAtomicInteger<int>::load (this=0x51) at > ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/thread/qbasicatomic.h:103 > #9 QtPrivate::RefCount::ref (this=0x51) at > ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qrefcount.h:55 > #10 QString::QString (other=..., this=0x7ffd1f8213e0) at > ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/tools/qstring.h:958 > #11 QTimeZonePrivate::Data::Data (this=0x7ffd1f8213e0) at > tools/qtimezoneprivate_p.h:81 > #12 QTzTimeZonePrivate::previousTransition (this=0x55eb6cc624c0, > beforeMSecsSinceEpoch=28799999) at tools/qtimezoneprivate_tz.cpp:1026 Judging from the backtrace, I'd say this upstream commit in Qt 5.12.3 fixed it: https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/src/corelib/tools/qtimezoneprivate_tz.cpp?h=5.13&id=1119cd4ece6555be82212b273d05d581bffb79d1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
