https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400704

rich...@meinsen.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rich...@meinsen.net

--- Comment #23 from rich...@meinsen.net ---
currently after system start and sometimes during work baloo grabs one cpu for
100% for quite a while, eats up to 13GB ram and makes the system quite
unresponsive (i7 w 4c+ht, 20gb ram, only ssd) when running.
this looks more like a complete reindexing of everything on the system and not
related to the amount of changed files. and i don't see how I could find what
exactly baloo is working on through means of balooctl. 
i use fedora 29 with standard schedulers. baloo taking 100% of cpu seems not
reasonable to me. also taking up to 13GB ram seems not reasonable to me.

during the last long run baloo status stated 
130470/133866 files index and current index size 15,61 GiB. there was no change
of more than 3000 large files since the last baloo 100% cpu run. indexing of a
new 185m git clone should have be done in very few minutes max.

Further the numbers in indexSize look strange to me

Actual Size: 15,61 GiB
Expected Size: 9,16 GiB

           PostingDB:       1,40 GiB   120.956 %
          PositionDB:     133,54 MiB    11.266 %
            DocTerms:     877,32 MiB    74.014 %
    DocFilenameTerms:      13,61 MiB     1.148 %
       DocXattrTerms:            0 B     0.000 %
              IdTree:       2,52 MiB     0.213 %
          IdFileName:      10,07 MiB     0.850 %
             DocTime:       5,64 MiB     0.476 %
             DocData:       6,92 MiB     0.584 %
   ContentIndexingDB:            0 B     0.000 %
         FailedIdsDB:            0 B     0.000 %
             MTimeDB:       2,18 MiB     0.184 %

Why is the expected size only 2/3 of actual?
And why don't the DB sizes sum up to the actual size?
And what does 120% really mean?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to