https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404465
arcli...@gmail.com <arcli...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latest Commit| |Request for referral to
| |higher committee of Linux
| |Mint
--- Comment #5 from arcli...@gmail.com <arcli...@gmail.com> ---
Christoph,
1. I accuse you of "Not reading the comments"
2. I challenge your authority in consequence and the validity of your comments
so far for failing to grasp the principle error of the K3b author in failing to
respect private property by allowing their code to operate without first
validating the system owners consent to run n+1 instances of K3b in an unknown
context. The K3b code is an invading object that may otherwise seriously impact
the services, resources and business schedule of the system owner!
I demand this matter is referred to a higher committee for Linux Mint to decide
on the content of this "Bug Report"
3. I demand that the quality of this BUG is determined by a fresh and
non-misogynistic approach by female peers.
Without trying to 2nd guess the intolerance shown towards my attempt to
understand the behaviour of yourself, the author and the other 3rd party
contributor that appear more concerned with the off topic issues than the
actual bug references.
The continued attack on my attempt to communicate with an unreasonable author
(an author without the critical concepts to reason with) has created a hostile
"team intolerance" issue that should not exist in an international class code
project, referring to the OS upon which the K3b code first exhibited
inappropriate naivety towards system resources that were not automatically the
property of the K3b author.
As you have not attended to the principle first you are instead referring to a
discussion that results from the apparent inability of the code author to
understand the required behaviour of their code in an environment other than
their own PC. If you do not perceive this as a bug, then perhaps you have not
written code that must observe these rules?
We live in an age of open source, open attitude, but in order to attain these
goals we must learn their nature and change with them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
