https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361021
--- Comment #10 from allan <agande...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to NSLW from comment #9) > (In reply to allan from comment #8) > > (In reply to NSLW from comment #0) > > > Buy transactions imported by CSV importer always have missing assignment > > > > It's not correct to say that they '...always have missing assignment' it is > > only under certain conditions. > > For me it always has missing assignment during import from CSV and empty > ledger. Do you know conditions under which it doesn't happen? Yes. Often, the problem is that a Buy/Sell/ReinvDiv, which involve funds transfers, does not have the name of the relevant checking/brokerage account provided. During CSV import of these types, an extra dialog opens that asks for the name of the checking/brokerage account that is to be used. If this is correctly entered, then the transaction is not unbalanced. In general, I do not have a problem, over many years, with missing assignments. > (In reply to allan from comment #7) > > There is also another issue, with fees sometimes getting the wrong sign, > > which I identified in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360129. I think > > the patch in this current bug may be related. > > According to my research bug #360129 can be independently fixed from this > bug and this bug can be independently fixed from bug #360129. > Moreover through simple sign changes in my patch I can cause both operations > to display warning about assignment and not only for sell operations. > How do you see them correlated? I don't see the two bugs as related, except that https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361029 highlighted the fee sign issue. I'm assuming/hoping that your patch here is for that same problem. I haven't yet had a chance to look into it. > Nevertheless, Allan please analyze this and another bug with patches for > them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
