https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396091
--- Comment #2 from gr...@sub.red --- > The differences between breeze-gtk and breeze-gtk-dark are likely a simple > omission, the result of forgetting to update the dark variant. Oops. That's what I thought. And that's why I also think that the code base should be reduced. There is no point in duplicating all the code for the dark theme if you could just share the basic stuff like layout, size, shape, ... and then only swap colours, is it? > Let me know what I can do to help you get started! Thanks, I've already done my first submission via Phabricator in the last days. However, I have some additional suggestions. One is that many GTK+ themes are using Sass, which offers additional functionality over CSS like variables, some math and easier nesting/inheritage. Sass needs less code and can be compiled to CSS afterwards, so it's easier to maintain. It would also be possible to replace GTK's own extensions, for example use variables which get replaced at CSS creation time rather than GTK's @define-color, which resides in the CSS. This would bring the opportunity to re-use the CSS on the web, if that's a use-case, I don't know. But to me it looks like some newer KDE web pages are using a Breeze-ish design. But I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss any of this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
