https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360257
--- Comment #2 from Elvis Angelaccio <elvis.angelac...@kdemail.net> --- (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #1) > I don't think we should be checking this. We display the error message from > NetworkManager once it fails to activate the connection and if NM is missing > something, it should report it then in the error message which we display to > the user. This makes sense indeed, so this report probably belongs upstream? > I also think that this is a packaging issue, if NM requires > something then it should be as a dependency (we have that in Fedora). I was wondering the same, because the plasma-nm Arch package does not require dnsmasq as optional dependency. However I discovered later that the networkmanager package does. So the Arch packaging is probably correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
