https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394906
--- Comment #4 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- I looked at the problem more deeply. When we use metadata we also read the fractional second (sub-second) from the EXIF and use it. But even if we round off or ignore the fractional second, there may be a difference between EXIF date and file date of 1 second for some images here from a Nikon. The only solution I see is that we always use the file date for the download history. However, this is not evaluated if metadata is used at the moment. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
