https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393708
--- Comment #13 from Henrik Fehlauer <rk...@lab12.net> --- > memory implications of the x-kde-force-image-copy approach seem minor I even measured it, I don't see how they are "minor" in any way. With the naive approach, this will affect _everyone_, even if they don't use the feature. I won't submit a patch which results blowing up startup memory usage of Plasma, when at the same time David and others are trying to get the memory usage down. Also, I never said the approach of x-kde-force-image-copy wouldn't work, I simply said that I did not yet work on making it more efficient. For example, Klipper could only store a single image with that tag, and don't save it for the next session at all. However, that's more complicated to implement, so it might need more time (unless you send a patch yourself). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
