https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
--- Comment #32 from Milian Wolff <m...@milianw.de> --- Long-term fixing that in libclang itself would be ideal. For now, we need to support older libclang and llvm-config anyways, so coming up with a heuristic is required anyways. We could also just say: We depend on clang being available for the version of libclang we use at runtime, then query that clang and use its path. I'd be fine with that too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
