https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
--- Comment #14 from Ivo Raisr <iv...@ivosh.net> --- My apologies, we were talking about different things which just now I realized. Now I understand you are talking about VG_USERREQ__LIBC_FREERES_DONE client request whereas I was talking about _vgnU_freeres wrapper(s). Yes, that is certainly possible. Now thinking about it more, I think also _vgnU_freeres should be just one. It will simplify things in vg_preloaded.c, m_main.c and scheduler.c. Passing parameter(s) to it is not so difficult after all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
