https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393675
Bug ID: 393675
Summary: KMail might not show that an invalid signature exists
Product: kmail2
Version: 5.2.3
Platform: Debian stable
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: NOR
Component: crypto
Assignee: kdepim-b...@kde.org
Reporter: aheine...@intevation.de
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 112320
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=112320&action=edit
The root ca of this test
Moved out from Bug 385687
> CERT_PATH_COMMON_05|ERROR|INVALID|n/a|
> Checks the behaviour of the application when a certificate has a wrong DER
> encoding. This path is not valid, because the certificate is not a properly
> encoded structure.
I have only tested this with 5.2.3 and not with a more recent version.
Import (gpgsm --import) the attached root ca and afterwards open the message
I'll attach in the next message.
KMail does not show that a signature exists. I don't think that the invalid
signature should be shown prominently as I don't think that any signed mail
should be displayed worse then an unsigned mail (
https://phabricator.kde.org/T3128 ). But some indication should probably be
given and missing it might point to a deeper problem in the parser.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
