https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362647
Stefan Brüns <stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.d
| |e
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Brüns <stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de> ---
I think a good start would be to create a database of testcases, so even a
developer not proficient in a specific script can test and improve the
coverage.
One possible format could be:
# description of the testcase
! filename_1234.png
+ filename ;; match filename
+ png ;; match png
+ 1234 ;; match 1234
- file ;; do not match file
+ file* ;; match with wildcard
# chinese testcase 1: match 測試 ("test")
! 測試testcase.txt
+ 測試
+ testcase
+ txt
;- 試測 ;; expected to fail, requires dictionary
+ 測試 txt
Testcases should probably be split into one file per language (combination).
Correct handling of languages like chinese - where words are not separated -
is hard, and requires a dictionary as far as I understand. The best one can do
currently is to split at a grapheme level. This would likely create a lot of
false positives when searching, but false positives are IMHO better than no
results at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
