https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854
--- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > Yes, but is the amount reasonable? You have it available, do you prefer the memory to lay around being unused? > 1.17 Gb RAM / 257 pages = 4.5 Mb per page, for a document that's only 3.2 Mb > on disk. This PDF is mostly text and a few graphics. First, what does it matter how much it takes on disk regarding to what the actual representation will be? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_bomb And second, we're caching the rendered pixmap, so yeah the file size matters nothing against what file rendering caching will occupy. > When I perform the same procedure in Evince, it tops out at 93 Mb and > doesn't feel any slower. So Okular is using 11 times as much RAM for its > caching, but doesn't seem notably faster. Sure, but the page may have taken 3 minutes to render, do you really want to add code that decides whether to cache the rendered pixmap depending on how much it took to render? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
