https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387391
--- Comment #25 from Venca B Spam <vbs...@centrum.cz> --- Thank you for your feedback! While studying the KDevelop architecture I realized all you stated. I compared this with my user level (or call it business requirements) and I see the way how it is implemented in KDevelop as "a bit that the technical solution is exposed to the end user" - but I could be wrong and it may be an intentional effect. I compared how it is solved in QtCreator and I like it more there (they use absolute path as it is defined in the build system). However in general I still like KDevelop more - which keeps my attention to this issue :-). There are however more consequences of how the symlinks are handled in KDevelop. I reported another bug (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387866#c5) where it is even more obvious that the canonicalized paths exposed to the end user is not perfect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
