https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346741
--- Comment #9 from Claus Appel <spectru...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Holger from comment #7) > (In reply to Claus Appel from comment #6) > > Could you please elaborate on why this is not secure? It is not clear to me. > > Sure. An unencrypted HDD can either be physically extracted and read / > modified in another PC, that is running it's own operating system. To that > other computer everything on your HDD is just data, no restrictions apply. All right, that makes sense. But does this have anything to do with "autologin-and-lock-screen"? Is it MORE secure to demand password BEFORE logging in the user than it is to demand password AFTER logging in the user? If not, then this - while good advice - does not have anything to do with this bug report, IMO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
