https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354724
--- Comment #44 from Andreas Hartmetz <ahartm...@gmail.com> --- I don't think that either dynamic properties or changing behavior that has been pretty much proven to be not broken by being around for over 10 years with no complaints will fly upstream, and I don't think they are a very good idea myself. For Qt5, an application attribute might be a good idea. For Qt6, I don't know. I mean there is the small problem that pseuso-SM for applications that think ignoring SM is fine only works if it asks absolutely nothing from applications. An application attribute might even work there as well: if you do care about SM, you have let's say at least 20 lines to write so you can live with another trivial one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
