https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196672
--- Comment #5 from Simon <freisi...@gmail.com> --- @Jaakko I didn't consider the totally dynamic case and that's not what it is today. It is an actual property, not just caching of something derived from the album content. I do see your point, such completely dynamic behaviour would actually be fine by me. However it is a much more intrusive change, and I made bad experiences with assuming a "normal" workflow - people do all kinds of things. You could also call adding images with a completely different date later on "not typical" (at least I never do that). Well I guess it is moot to discuss this in more detail until someone picks this up and does it - I added it to my list of things to do when time permits, but that can mean anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
