https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379838
--- Comment #2 from Julian Seward <jsew...@acm.org> --- (In reply to Ivo Raisr from comment #1) That's weird. I have never seen the x86 front end fail in that way before, nor for that matter the amd64 front end (it has basically identical logic.) disAMode should never be called with a modrm byte that indicates in fact a register. Do you have any local modifications? Or is there some inconsistent compilation problem? I can't imagine what through, given that disAMode and all its callers are in the same source file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.