https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379205

--- Comment #11 from Andrius Štikonas <andr...@stikonas.eu> ---
(In reply to kaguru from comment #10)
> I and others can confirm that this patch fixed the problem:
> https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/697
> 
> I could see a potential edge case where someone's creating a luks volume in
> a luks volume, in which case checking for the expected parent volume would
> be better, but for the non-hypothetical, things are in good shape.
> 
> Any chance we could get a patch version bump, in hopes that we can get it
> into package managers sooner?

Unlikely before June. I can try to do it then...

luks inside luks is not supported even now. A lot of other luks code was not
designed with this in mind. In any case luks inside luks doesn't make sense.
Well, luks->lvm->luks is supported though, so will have to test it later. Well,
that's why I said I wouldn't have time for release soon.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to