https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378995

--- Comment #4 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3)
> question is, what should happen after you resume it?
> 
> Should it bring back the notification? or should it just "skip" the relax
> time?

As I noticed, in the case that RSIBreak is suspended, it doesn't take activity
into account. I'm of the opinion that it would be better if suspended RSIBreak
were hidden/silent than frozen.
For instance; someone is super busy and they can't afford any more time off
work, therefore they might suspend RSIBreak for a while. However, they might
leave the computer for a while and if they just resume RSIBreak after that, it
would make them take a break again. - which might be undesired -
On the other hand, if someone hadn't taken a rest, after the resume they should
do.

I don't want to give you a lot of work and headaches. I think it's better if
you relax more than skip one. So if the upper idea is too time consuming to
carry out then I would say it should bring back the notification where it was
left off.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to