https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378777
--- Comment #11 from Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> --- (In reply to Sven Brauch from comment #10) > You mean, show a hint that a define is missing in order to have that struct > defined? Yes. - I am thinking also about possibilities in such a direction. Could such functionality help in the better understanding of the involved dependencies? > Is your problem solved? The answer depends on your views around the responsibilities for an advanced software development environment like KDevelop. 1. It seems that I needed a refresh for the current version of this evolving tool. I got information about further system configuration possibilities. 2. I imagine that the mentioned source code analysis display can still be improved. I assume that the discussion for my clarification requests could be continued with the evolution of the provided add-ons/plug-ins. The presented information can be correct for my selection of an analysis environment. But they could also be interpreted in another way besides a misconfiguration, couldn't they? 3. I dared to look at an intermediate development status of some source files for a known software where my own knowledge is still incomplete. Now I wonder about the situation if a preprocessor symbol like “CONFIG_GENERIC_PINCTRL_GROUPS” (from the header file “drivers/pinctrl/core.h”) should also appear in the source file “drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c”. Do specifications need to be extended for conditional compilation there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
