https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375839
--- Comment #16 from Julian Seward <jsew...@acm.org> --- (In reply to ux from comment #15) > My bad. So this block? > Full function in attachment. Ok .. nearly there. Could you please disassemble the function using the normal AT&T syntax rather than then Intel syntax, so I don't have to hand-translate it to AT&T syntax myself in order to have a test case? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
