https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375388
--- Comment #30 from somnia...@hushmail.com ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #29)
> I have a theory on this.
>
> The code is:
> for (QQuickItem *childItem : qAsConst(childItems)) {
> childVisibilityChanged |=
> QQuickItemPrivate::get(childItem)-
> >setEffectiveVisibleRecur(newEffectiveVisible);
> }
> ...
> emit q->visibleChanged();
>
Should it test for the current visible state before setting
newEffectiveVisible?
for (QQuickItem *childItem : qAsConst(childItems)) {
if (childItem->isVisible() == newEffectiveVisible) continue;
childVisibilityChanged |=
QQuickItemPrivate::get(childItem)->setEffectiveVisibleRecur(newEffectiveVisible);
}
And what happens if a childItem is disabled and its visibility is toggled?
if (!childItem->isEnabled || childItem->isVisible() == newEffectiveVisible)
continue;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
