https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377060
--- Comment #12 from Dmitry Kazakov <dimul...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Boudewijn Rempt from comment #10) > Created attachment 104304 [details] > scaled down with 2.9.0 and 3.0.0 > > I have no system where 2.8 is still working, but 2.9 and 3.0 give identical > results. As is to be expected, since nobody has touched this code since 2005. Hi, Boud! Just loking into **your** attached images, I can clearly see that 29.png is **much** sharper and clear than 30.png. So this is a regression. I have refactored transformation algorithms around 2012 and I remember that the result was much better that this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
