https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375560
--- Comment #2 from i...@axel-krebs.de --- Gilles: I still run digiKam 5.4, you showed me download of: digiKam-5.4.0-01-x86-64.appimage. - Maybe resulting from this circumstances, I can _NOT_ start bug reports from within the digiKam program automatically. So additional information might by not processed. Panorama still does not work but hangs with message - [digikam] [Bug 374812] Panorama stops - see attachment. ---------------- "Workslow" ( :-) : - with digiKam, I only process jpg's; typical sites some 15 MB each in average. - my PC has 16 GB RAM. - processing BQM in parallel with image editor- only a few times. Is unpractical slow! - looks like digiKam occupies alles resources whil only using single CPU's. Don't know, how to eluciate this in detail, unfortunately. - how can I send you some pics? My eMail ist too slow by far. Am 25.01.2017 um 22:28 schrieb bugzilla_nore...@kde.org: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375560 > > caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |caulier.gil...@gmail.com > Component|general |BatchQueueManager > > --- Comment #1 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- > Wow. Ten hours to process 40 36Mpx images... Incredible. > > Do you process RAW files ? > > How many RAM do you have ? > > Do you process items in parallel with BQM ? > > In all case, i have similar image size here (panorama), and more, and this do > not take this time to process. My computer : i7-3Ghz, 32Gb RAM. > > If you share some items through the cloud, i can try to reproduce your > workflow > to compare. > > Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
