https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511945
--- Comment #66 from Maxim Egorushkin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #65) > That sounds like passive aggression, so I'll more discourteously rephrase: Can you cite those words which sound like that to you? > - You've already asked three times. Asked for what, exactly? > Instead, you need to wait longer, > because the developers aren't servants. That might appear obvious, but your > conduct demonstrates that you haven't considered that. What makes you qualified to talk about developers? > - Additionally, if a developer has closed a report, reopening it, for > something this trivial, generally isn't the best course of action. However, > I've been wrong about this beforehand, so I'll wait to see. When a developer closes a report, it is accompanied with an audit message with explanation and urls to further information. This is not the case here. > For the sake of everyone's inbox, don't respond again, unless you've > something significant to add. I shan't. These sentences of yours are direct aggression indeed, loud and clear. Who are you? Why do you reply to messages not addressed to you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
