https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511543
Zamundaaa <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- Status|NEEDSINFO |CONFIRMED --- Comment #11 from Zamundaaa <[email protected]> --- Okay, so these are the~120Hz modes the kernel says your display supports: > │ │ │ ├───1920×[email protected] driver phsync pvsync > │ │ │ ├───1920×[email protected] driver phsync pvsync 16:9 > │ │ │ ├───1920×[email protected] driver phsync pvsync 16:9 and kscreen-doctor correctly reports these modes from the list. I imagine there might be something weird going on with how the actual refresh rate number is calculated. edid-decode doesn't even show *any* 119.88Hz mode in your display's EDID, it only shows two "120.000000" Hz modes... The best course of action here is imo though not to find more workarounds, but rather find out what exactly makes these two 120Hz modes different and plumb that into the output configuration system, so that both are shown in the list. I can imagine that one of them has reduced blanking (also requiring slightly reduced bandwidth afaik), while the other doesn't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
