https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374799
--- Comment #3 from Roger Foss <roger.f...@gmail.com> --- Well, my take on this is if you want to convert video files, you will probably want to do it repeatedly, to batches of files. Hence, the BQM. Also once that's implemented, I can imagine applying other base tools to videos. Ie. amp up the brightness, add some metadata, enhance contrast. I could see the some of the same base tools apply to video. I shall not get too far ahead: I know digikam is primarily a photo management tool. My point is this: why NOT the BQM? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
