https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510443

--- Comment #2 from Harald Sitter <[email protected]> ---
I believe this temporary file is basically just working around the inflexible
KConfig API. We'd not need the tmpfile if we could assemble the config in
memory. To that end I believe the solution here is to refactor KConfig a bit so
it can accept a QIODevice instead of a file path. This would then allow us to
create a memfd-backed QIODevice that purely lives in memory and doesn't require
the tmpfile dance.

Probably needs some restructuring of KConfig internals though so as to not get
confused between path-based configs and QIOD-based configs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to