https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507933
--- Comment #7 from Riccardo Robecchi <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 185444 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=185444&action=edit Balanced vs minimum (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #6) > > It should be defined by the content of that specific row > Isn't that what "Minimum" does? No, it isn't. See the screenshot for comparison: on top is "balanced", on the bottom is "minimum". The widget on the right hand side becomes scrollable. Although I am not sure whether this is intended behaviour, I think there are legitimate use cases for this, so I personally would not change how this behaves. The behaviour that Arjen advocates for should be "maximum", rather than "balanced" (and, funnily enough, trying the "maximum" height I found it to be utterly broken; I opened bug 510162 for that). We would therefore have: - minimum: the widget occupies the least possible amount of space, becoming scrollable if that is an option. - balanced: the widget scales according to its own content. - maximum: the widget extends to the largest size in the page, so that all rows look the same. This seems like a much more balanced (pun intended) approach than what is currently implemented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
