https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506816
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to mcermak from comment #1) > Created attachment 184869 [details] > proposed patch +PRE(sys_futex_waitv) +{ + /* asmlinkage long sys_futex_waitv(struct futex_waitv __user *waiters, + * unsigned int nr_futexes, unsigned int flags, + * struct __kernel_timespec __user *timeout, clockid_t clockid); */ + + PRINT("sys_futex_waitv ( %#" FMT_REGWORD "x, %ld, %ld, %#" FMT_REGWORD "x, %d )", + ARG1, SARG2, SARG3, ARG4, ARG5); + PRE_MEM_READ("sys_futex_waitv(waiters)", ARG1, sizeof(struct vki_futex_waitv)); Shouldn't that be sizeof(struct vki_futex_waitv) * ARG2? + PRE_MEM_READ("sys_futex_waitv(timeout)", ARG4, sizeof(struct vki__kernel_timespec)); +} Looks good otherwise. Do all LTP futex_waitv tests pass with this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
