https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506971
Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507853 --- Comment #4 from Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> --- - faccessat01 faccessat01.c:49: TFAIL: faccessat(-100, faccessatdir/faccessatfile, R_OK, 0) failed: EBADF (9) - faccessat201 faccessat201.c:50: TPASS: faccessat2(3, faccessat2file, R_OK, 0) passed faccessat201.c:50: TFAIL: faccessat2(-1, /tmp/LTP_facejD0qP/faccessat2dir/faccessat2file, R_OK, 0) failed: EBADF (9) faccessat201.c:50: TFAIL: faccessat2(-100, faccessat2dir/faccessat2file, R_OK, 0) failed: EBADF (9) faccessat201.c:50: TPASS: faccessat2(3, faccessat2file, R_OK, 512) passed faccessat201.c:50: TFAIL: faccessat2(-1, /tmp/LTP_facejD0qP/faccessat2dir/faccessat2file, R_OK, 512) failed: EBADF (9) faccessat201.c:50: TFAIL: faccessat2(-100, faccessat2dir/faccessat2file, R_OK, 512) failed: EBADF (9) faccessat201.c:50: TFAIL: faccessat2(-100, faccessat2symlink, R_OK, 256) failed: EBADF (9) This seems to be introduced by commit bc66a6e865d952ac51ffb0e63c127ce7cd977b98 Add fd_allowed and POST_newFd_RES to all syscalls that use or return fds https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507853 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507853 [Bug 507853] faccessat and faccessat2 should handle AT_FDCWD, AT_EMPTY_PATH and absolute paths -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
