https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #16 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- Hi Rolf, About the speed, it's clear. There is nothing to improve in digiKam as we are relevant to the open source DNG SDK which is not all the code of the Adobe DNG Converter, only the backend to process files. We are also dependent on the libraw library used in digiKam to extract non demosaiced RAW data and pass it to the DNG converter. Here also, no improvements can be done about the speed as extraction is streamlined with the RAW file. No preprocessing is done in libraw where we can expect to parallelize something. About the quality and the rendering of the DNG conversion, we apply the best metadata backport and adjustments that we know to pass to the DNG SDK. You must know that even if the DNG SDK is an open source component, there is no doc and examples available. It's difficult to use and tune. Also, at each DNG SDK version the API changes and the SDK calls must be adjusted, without any help from the Adobe team. So for me, the best thing to do is already here in digiKam. Do not expect serious improvements in the future... Best regards Gilles Caulier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
