https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467083
--- Comment #6 from medin <med.medin.2...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Riccardo Robecchi from comment #5) > (In reply to medin from comment #4) > > cryfs slow browsing is still a problem for Plasma 6.3.5, it can't even > > handle a small folder containing 10gb of data, gocryptfs is much faster, but > > I don't know if it's safer than cryfs. > > It is as safe as cryfs, there are some differences in implementation that > make it more or less suitable for the encryption of individual files and > folders, but that is not an issue with Vaults. There is no practical > downside to using it. I found this page https://www.cryfs.org/comparison It seems that cryfs split the whole data and hides its structure and metadata which makes it more suitable for uploading to cloud storages. But for local storage I think others are more suitable to adopt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
