https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503432
--- Comment #2 from GK <hgkam...@hotmail.com> ---
- I was hoping 3 things
- (a) maintenance overhead for cross platform is minimal
- (b) not strongly coupled to the desktop-environment
- (c) an simple/basic app like this is almost feature complete once one gets
the tabs for clock, alarm, timer, stopwatch is done
- > every system has a clock like this
- The compelling reason is want of uniformity
- presently each such app on its own system has its own personality/quirks.
- they may look similar but they are not identical, certain button
locations, labeling, settings etc will be different.
- a user has to get used to each app, and not rely on finger memory when
using the app on each different system
- low level system api like for getting time, setting timers,
backgrounding, etc do not change as much, perhaps even from one OS kernel
version to another, but the GUI does. If QT abstracts that change across
various systems. one as an identical clock app across those systems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
