https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=503451
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Coonan <kevin.coo...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Antonio Rojas from comment #4) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97420 *** I am not clear on the resolution for that prior bug. It was acknowledged as a problem, but not fixed. The fact that the initial use case analysis was incomplete isn't a resolution! Just because I have font substitution set up on my computer that fills in a given gap in some other font is not a guarantee that others will be able to read a document sent to them. It totally depends on what other fonts someone has installed and how they have their font substitution set up. Most people assume that if I send them a document in a font they don't have, and they install that font it will fix any rendering problems. This usually easy enough as I only (very rarely) use the standard Windows fonts and open source fonts--which depends on their corporate computer security settings whether nor not they are even allowed to install a font. As with others, I have had to turn to software from GNOME, which is not ideal. Moreover, the problem with showing NO glyphs for a given font has not been addressed at all. So while others have noted the problem, it has not been resolved. I don't see any mention of the other issue with not showing anything in a font. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
