https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371539
--- Comment #17 from kavra <kavra.ka...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Albert Vaca from comment #16) > I don't think anything related to IP version has changed since 0.9... the > biggest thing that differs between 0.9 and 1.0 is the kind of encryption > used. > > Can you post the "netstat -tulpen" output on both 1.0 and 0.9 to see if > there is actually a difference? This way we will be sure it's a IPv6-related > problem and not something related to the encryption like a cipher suites > mismatch. > > > Since I can't reproduce this issue, I will need your help guys to solve the > problem :) of course ;) Version 0.9g: (Not all processes could be identified, non-owned process info will not be shown, you would have to be root to see it all.) Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN - tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5900 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 12602/krfb tcp6 0 0 ::1:631 :::* LISTEN - tcp6 0 0 :::5900 :::* LISTEN 12602/krfb tcp6 0 0 :::1714 :::* LISTEN 24925/kdeconnectd udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:68 0.0.0.0:* - udp6 0 0 :::47392 :::* 24925/kdeconnectd udp6 0 0 :::1714 :::* 24925/kdeconnectd Version 1.x Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name tcp 0 0 localhost:ipp 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN - tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5900 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 11182/krfb tcp6 0 0 [::]:1716 [::]:* LISTEN 11031/kdeconnectd tcp6 0 0 localhost:ipp [::]:* LISTEN - tcp6 0 0 [::]:5900 [::]:* LISTEN 11182/krfb udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:47934 0.0.0.0:* - udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:bootpc 0.0.0.0:* - udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:bootpc 0.0.0.0:* - udp6 0 0 [::]:1716 [::]:* 11031/kdeconnectd udp6 0 0 [::]:44685 [::]:* - According to this thread and the one of gentoo that I follow in parallel(https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7999976.html#7999976), the problem happens with different models of telephone and operating system. In the gentoo thread there are tcpdump outputs, in case they can help. Copy a piece: # tcpdump portrange 1716-1730 -vv dropped privs to tcpdump tcpdump: listening on enp5s0f2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes 19:03:57.222116 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 854) 192.168.0.2.43542 > 255.255.255.255.1716: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 826 19:03:57.222379 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24029, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [S], cksum 0x9a35 (correct), seq 3441841316, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 2034041 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0 19:03:57.223751 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) 192.168.0.2.1716 > 192.168.0.50.34846: Flags [S.], cksum 0xf4a4 (correct), seq 1635920093, ack 3441841317, win 65535, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 8228018 ecr 2034041,nop,wscale 8], length 0 19:03:57.223791 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24030, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [.], cksum 0x228b (correct), seq 1, ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 2034043 ecr 8228018], length 0 19:03:57.224061 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24031, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1141) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [P.], cksum 0x0bf7 (correct), seq 1:1090, ack 1, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 2034043 ecr 8228018], length 1089 19:03:57.225568 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 42092, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.2.1716 > 192.168.0.50.34846: Flags [.], cksum 0x1dd3 (correct), seq 1, ack 1090, win 348, options [nop,nop,TS val 8228018 ecr 2034043], length 0 19:03:57.343945 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 42093, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 128) 192.168.0.2.1716 > 192.168.0.50.34846: Flags [P.], cksum 0x7240 (correct), seq 1:77, ack 1090, win 348, options [nop,nop,TS val 8228030 ecr 2034043], length 76 19:03:57.343982 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24032, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [.], cksum 0x1d7a (correct), seq 1090, ack 77, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 2034163 ecr 8228030], length 0 19:03:57.344135 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24033, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [F.], cksum 0x1d79 (correct), seq 1090, ack 77, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 2034163 ecr 8228030], length 0 19:03:57.345986 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 42094, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.2.1716 > 192.168.0.50.34846: Flags [F.], cksum 0x1d01 (correct), seq 77, ack 1091, win 348, options [nop,nop,TS val 8228030 ecr 2034163], length 0 19:03:57.346030 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 24034, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 52) 192.168.0.50.34846 > 192.168.0.2.1716: Flags [.], cksum 0x1d76 (correct), seq 1091, ack 78, win 229, options [nop,nop,TS val 2034165 ecr 8228030], length 0 Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
