https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463197
--- Comment #37 from spiesant <metal...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #36) > @spiesant, > > Before to continue this VERY constructive talk in this room, please read > that urgently: > > https://kde.org/code-of-conduct/ > > Notes: > - Do not try to explain to me how to manage an open source project created > in 2001. > - About your comment 11, seriously, you think that i have been coding for a > few weeks only. > > Thank you for your consideration and your contribution, it's always a > pleasure... > > Gilles Caulier I read it in full. I apologize if that response was overly abrasive - I will admit that I let my frustration get the best of me and shouldn't have. Not that it excuses my frustrated way of responding, but hopefully there's at least some understanding why this sequence of events could lead to frustration: * I posted an issue & attempted to engage in constructive discussion. In 2022, that led up to a comment that I thought *might* provide provide context to push it forward. It may or may not have been useful. But as it was ignored with no response that directly addresses the points it made, I don't know. * For 2.5 years I waited, occasionally pinging in hopes that someone might reply. (Yes, I do realize this is an open-source project and its developers are volunteers with no obligation to reply. I'm only attempting to convey the sequence of events.) * In 2025, a different user joined the thread and posted an unrelated issue. * The unrelated issue was *immediately* addressed, and my topic closed. * I responded that my issue was not addressed. * You responded again, and it's possible that at this point I misinterpreted your reply. My interpretation of your "simple no?" comment was that you were saying i.e. "duh, it's simple to see that it's fixed." that may have been wrong. Try to put yourself in my shoes. I've been watching this issue for 2.5 years, someone else jumps in, changes the subject, and the issue is closed. So I overreacted. I apologize. > About your comment 11, seriously, you think that i have been coding for a few > weeks only. * I assume you're referring to comment 12 (comment 11 was from you). * If the suggestions in my comment 12 are incorrect/irrelevant, that's exactly what I've been asking for a response for 2.5 years. Maybe they're stupid and maybe not, but I can't know if there's no meaningful response, can I? * (This also seems like a sarcastic/abrasive of a comment per the code of conduct, is it not?) > Do not try to explain to me how to manage an open source project created in > 2001. Honestly I'm not sure what this refers to exactly. My goal is really quite simple: to try to make progress toward identifying this issue. As I have to keep using Lightroom in a Windows VM, every so often I'm reminded "man I wish I could just use Digikam." So I try it again, see that it has the same issue, come here to check for progress/replies, find that there's none. My intention is not to stir up trouble. It's just to try to get it fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
