https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485702
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> --- If we eventually port these apps to QML or create QML competitors, of course KParts won't fit in there. But KParts is an implementation detail that in principle the user shouldn't care about; that's not really the right question to ask. Instead, the question is how to get embedded terminal views, file views, etc working; those are the things people want; the under-the-hood implementation is not so important. And it's not a problem to design QML-based library components for things like terminal views and file views that can be integrated into QML apps. Kparts is simply an older implementation of this kind of functionality that allowed it to be swapped out at runtime. That's not really a very important part, which is my reading of why the technology sort of got forgotten over time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
