https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501365
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> --- (In reply to mcermak from comment #5) > Created attachment 179492 [details] > possible patch > > Hello guys, thank you for all the comments. I've found existing wrapper for > sys_epoll_create that seems to be close to this new sys_userfaultfd, and > modelled the new wrapper after it. Does the new patch look fine? Yes, that looks good. Thanks. You are only hooking this up for amd64-linux, but __NR_userfaultfd is defined for all linux arches in: include/vki/vki-scnums-amd64-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-arm-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-arm64-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-mips32-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-mips64-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-nanomips-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-ppc32-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-ppc64-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-riscv64-linux.h include/vki/vki-scnums-x86-linux.h So you really can/should hook this up also in: coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-arm64-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-mips32-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-mips64-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-nanomips-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc32-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-ppc64-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-riscv64-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-s390x-linux.c coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-x86-linux.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
