https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=501464
Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |michael_mil...@msn.com
--- Comment #5 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> ---
(In reply to Andy from comment #4)
> Hi!
> I think all unconfirmed faces is better.
> In the example photo, you can see that names were automatically suggested
> for some faces. False positives. I would have to set those to unknown first.
> I always confirm all known faces in the photo and ignore the rest. But if
> you take a photo on vacation or at a large event, you don't need to archive
> it in the database.
>
> Regards
> Andy
Hi Andy,
There is already an option in digiKam to ignore all unknown faces. If you
delete the face rectange, digiKam may find it again if you run another face
scan on the image. I think your goal is to view the image with only the
confirmed faces labeled, and any unknown or unconfirmed faces do not have a
face rectangle and label shown on the image. Correct?
Maik/Gilles, another idea is to have a checkbox for "Hide ignored faces". This
would preserve the face data so it wouldn't be detected again, but still only
show confirmed and unconfirmed faces. Also, we could make it easier to ignore
both unknown and unconfirmed faces. The result I think would be the same, but
would preserve the face data in the DB.
Cheers,
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
