https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498211
--- Comment #26 from Guido <guido.iod...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Gauthier from comment #25) > (In reply to Guido from comment #24) > Well if a KDE Devs judges it's a big change, then unless you are also are > one, I am not, but neither am I stupid enough not to know how to read a few lines of code. > That said don't understand this: > > (In reply to Méven from comment #23) > > But that's a big change I am not very comfortable backporting. > > Only part of it needs to be backported. > > No-one is asking for "backporting" as far as I can tell. They wonder if > it'll be included in the "next" release 24.12.3 (which seems sensible and > legitimate as there is clearly a regression that happened in 24.12.2). This is exactly what I was saying. If a regression was introduced in a monthly point release, its correction makes sense in the next one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
