https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495540
--- Comment #7 from cvinhaes <k...@cvinhaes.33mail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Miller from comment #6) > (In reply to cvinhaes from comment #3) > > > > Thank you for your quick response. If you mean with DigiKam, I have tested > > with YOLO Nano v5 and ResNet50. If you mean to what I am comparing Digikam > > to, that is Photoprism,which adopts NASNet Mobile 224 , I think. Photoprism > > is way more conservative but yeld more reliable results overall. Both > > aplications are connected to the same set of photos. > > I want to let you know I haven't forgotten about this ticket. I'm rewriting > the auto-tagging pipelines now. > > I've tested several models including multiple versions of NasNet, and it > seems YOLO v11 is the most accurate. It will probably be a few more weeks > until the new code and models are merged into the daily builds. There will > be an update to this bug entry when the new code is available if you'd like > to test. > > Cheers, > Mike Thank you for the updates, mate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
