https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498062

Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |michael_mil...@msn.com

--- Comment #1 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> ---
(In reply to cyclikov from comment #0)
> If a tag has one or two incorrectly marked persons, it makes a lot of
> incorrect suggests.  If the collection is small, you can ‘manually’ check
> every face, but I have a collection of over 100 people and between 10-50 and
> 3000 faces in each, which makes checking impossible. Even with an accuracy
> parameter of ‘10’, you can sometimes add the wrong face.
> It is not clear how to remove the tag from an incorrectly tagged face, for
> example if I want to add it later. I have to move the existing rectangle,
> draw a new one and remove the incorrectly marked face.
In the People sidebar on the left, then select the person who has the
incorrectly confirmed face.  Find the face in the list.  Right-click on the
face and select Remove Tag.  Select the incorrect name tag from the face. 

Doing this will move the face back to "Unknown" without removing the rectangle.


> Maybe we should add functionality to check faces inside the tag, like asking
> ‘is this person really this person’ or just ‘bad quality, not to be using’.
> Or if many times a suggestion is rejected or deleted, show what causes such
> suggestions and suggest how it can be fixed.
We're working on an idea to help identify incorrectly tagged faces.

> 
> Also unclear behaviour when enabling OpenCV: very slow recognition. Without
> (On CPU) is faster, but multithreading can cause program crash. (Build:
> digiKam-8.6.0-20241229T180202-Qt6-Win64)
Can you please try the latest daily build and see if the problem still exists? 
There have been several changes since December.

Cheers,
Mike

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to