https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357617
--- Comment #4 from Larx <throwa...@online.de> --- An addition to that: What is strange is, that Digikam already has applied the renanaming schema not only to the MTS file, but also to the next normal JPG file "20160109_083448.JPG", which is the picture previously named "P1060285.JPG". I.e. the batch rename process renames all JPG files before the MTS file, the MTS file itself and also the next JPG file after the MTS file. And only then the rename process files because the MTS file does no longer exist with its original file name. Which is true, as it has been renamed as planned. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
