https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348156
--- Comment #21 from jeremy9...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #20) > The checkbox is already there (this is how scripts are triggered) > Please understand that everybody wants "his" feature to activate by sheer > will, but we lack a brain interface. That's not what I meant. I mean a checkbox easily discoverable, like the one "unredirect windows" or even easier to find and use because the scripts are in their own windows and for a "normal" user it's not really obvious that in order to play game in good condition he need to activate a script in this particular window. > Sorry, I don't follow. It is *exactly* what's described in the "X11 > workaround" section (and the rest is irrelevant to the topic) - The suggestion of Martin is "When a fullscreen game starts, it can create a “sub-session” on a new virtual terminal and become the logind- session controller for that session. Etc...". It seems that is not really easy to do and not exactly the same thing that simply disabling compositing. But nevermind, it's not important here. > the only question is "who activates the block" and *obviously* the ideal > solution > would be the client in question would just say "make me uncomposited". As you know, that's the point of this _NET_WM_BYPASS_COMPOSITOR (bug 349910). But unfortunately not every software that can take benefit of it will use it, therefore the blacklist. By the way I see that you have submitted a review request https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126561/ Does this mean that it will be implemented ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
