https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328122
--- Comment #24 from Martin Gräßlin <mgraess...@kde.org> --- > Which one? signal LogindIntegration::sessionActiveChanged > there's no guarantee the active VT even runs a session (could be getty and/or > some global top/dmesg stuff) AFAIU logind should still indicate whether the session is active. And of course rather a corner case :-) > Ie. can we at all (ignoring a bit that this will upset BSD users ;-) nah, it's a workaround for a corner case. It's not like we are taking away a feature or anything. I'd prefer to first try with freeze on session change. I'm a little bit worried about the overhead for suspend/resume when switching VTs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
